How Do You Win a Strict Liability Case? – 5 Ways

How Do You Win a Strict Liability Case? – 5 Ways is discussed in this article with 5 of such ways listed and explicated for your perusal.

What is strict liability in tort?

How Do You Win a Strict Liability Case? - 5 Ways
How Do You Win a Strict Liability Case? – Photo Source:

Read Also: SWOT Analysis of Insurance Industry

Strict liability is a concept that is currently applicable in both civil and criminal law.  Strict liability states that a defendant is liable for his or her actions in response to or their intention at the cause of the action. This article will focus on how to win a strict liability case:

1. Prove of sustained injury

To win a strict liability case, the client has to prove two cases, first, he had an injury during the incident, and second that the sustained injury was as a result of the incident or it must have been caused by the other party.

These claims must match the date of the incident and may have medical evidence as authentic proof. Strict Liability Cases can be very easily proven in accidental cases as possible witnesses can testify but in a case where it involves a party and the other party’s product, object, or even animal, the proof of the case may be difficult in some scenarios. As such it is advisable to quickly take proof when the incident happened or occurred to win the case.

2. Pay attention to Product Liability Cases

Strict liability cases can also apply to products as such it is advisable to pay more attention to Product liability cases which may require extra effort to win your claims. The court will oblige the plaintiff to produce and verify these basic facts.

First, the product is the cause of the injury based on the fact that the injury sustained had a baseless, invalid, groundless, unsubstantiated, unsupported, unwarranted defect that occurred during packaging, production, or delivery.

Read Also: 9 Principles of Subrogation in Insurance Law

The second fact that should be justified is that the plaintiff used the product correctly and according to social or moral rules or according to the producer’s guidelines.

The third fact that will be justified is that there is no visible sign or authentic proof that the plaintiff did not in any way consequential, or monumental altered the product before using it. Thus, with these facts, the case will be justified.

3. Winning complexity cases

In cases where strict liability is very hard to understand, explain, or deal, with due to the intricacies and finer points outlined in the law for each classification and sub-classification.

It is advisable to see someone, especially a lawyer for advice and a doctor who deals with injury attorneys for professional opinion in dealing with the situation. This professional advice can assist you in navigating your claim and dealing with further issues.

4. Get all clarification about that particular strict liability to win the case

Strict Liability requires the knowledge and ability to judge a particular situation or subject. Often the injury sustained by the individual can be based on injury cases based on failure to take care as a responsible person or due to lack of normal care or attention.

Read Also: What are the 5 P’s in Insurance?

One party can be less concerned while the other party sustains an injury due to this carelessness. There are certain contrary situations where an individual sustains an injury without carelessness.

This may be because one party is strictly responsible for their actions under the law notwithstanding how much care and attention they pay to their actions, there are liable.

5.  Criminal Cases

Strict liability case is also applicable to criminal cases. Strict liability laws are set and structured to raise and upgrade the health and safety of society.

In civil law, strict liability is structured to hold the individual financially liable for any damage that may arise due to various activities.

This is especially one of the hazardous activities like the action or process of excavating that require explosives. In cases where they are explosives, it may result in damage or harm to the individual, and the company using the explosives could be held strictly liable for this resultant effect. The company can be held accountable or responsible no matter the company’s claims and level of carefulness.

In conclusion in dealing with any strict liability case, the defendant has to win the case and be more careful least he can be held accountable for an offense he never committed.

Read Also: What are the 4 Key Elements of an Insurance Policy?

Generally winning strict liability cases is particularly based on three conditions, first, faulty products, hazardous activity, and an injury sustained and caused by an animal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like